No items under SQL server group

Hi,
We're running SQL server 2000 standard edition on Windows 2003. I logged in
using my domain account which is member of an admin group. But in Enterprise
Manger, under SQL Server Group, I got 'no items'. How come? I used to be
able to use another domain account in the same admin group to log on and had
no problem. What did I miss?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Bing
Hi
"bing" wrote:

> Hi,
> We're running SQL server 2000 standard edition on Windows 2003. I logged in
> using my domain account which is member of an admin group. But in Enterprise
> Manger, under SQL Server Group, I got 'no items'. How come? I used to be
> able to use another domain account in the same admin group to log on and had
> no problem. What did I miss?
> Thanks in advance for any help.
> Bing
When you run SQL Server Enterprise Manager for the first time, it should
automatically registers all instances of a local SQL Server, but any
instances that are added afterwards will be not be automatically registered.
You must be on the server where the instance is installed for this to occur.
If you have removed the registration you will need to manually add it again.
Also check that the registry has not been changed/corrupted.
John

No items under SQL server group

Hi,
We're running SQL server 2000 standard edition on Windows 2003. I logged in
using my domain account which is member of an admin group. But in Enterpris
e
Manger, under SQL Server Group, I got 'no items'. How come? I used to be
able to use another domain account in the same admin group to log on and had
no problem. What did I miss?
Thanks in advance for any help.
BingHi
"bing" wrote:

> Hi,
> We're running SQL server 2000 standard edition on Windows 2003. I logged
in
> using my domain account which is member of an admin group. But in Enterpr
ise
> Manger, under SQL Server Group, I got 'no items'. How come? I used to be
> able to use another domain account in the same admin group to log on and h
ad
> no problem. What did I miss?
> Thanks in advance for any help.
> Bing
When you run SQL Server Enterprise Manager for the first time, it should
automatically registers all instances of a local SQL Server, but any
instances that are added afterwards will be not be automatically registered.
You must be on the server where the instance is installed for this to occur.
If you have removed the registration you will need to manually add it again.
Also check that the registry has not been changed/corrupted.
John

No items under SQL server group

Hi,
We're running SQL server 2000 standard edition on Windows 2003. I logged in
using my domain account which is member of an admin group. But in Enterprise
Manger, under SQL Server Group, I got 'no items'. How come? I used to be
able to use another domain account in the same admin group to log on and had
no problem. What did I miss?
Thanks in advance for any help.
BingHi
"bing" wrote:
> Hi,
> We're running SQL server 2000 standard edition on Windows 2003. I logged in
> using my domain account which is member of an admin group. But in Enterprise
> Manger, under SQL Server Group, I got 'no items'. How come? I used to be
> able to use another domain account in the same admin group to log on and had
> no problem. What did I miss?
> Thanks in advance for any help.
> Bing
When you run SQL Server Enterprise Manager for the first time, it should
automatically registers all instances of a local SQL Server, but any
instances that are added afterwards will be not be automatically registered.
You must be on the server where the instance is installed for this to occur.
If you have removed the registration you will need to manually add it again.
Also check that the registry has not been changed/corrupted.
Johnsql

no items in SQL Server Group

In my enterprise mngr under Microsoft sql Servers
Sql Server Group

I see (No Items)

My network guy doesnt no much about this and i know nothing (all my experience is with db on my local hd.

Please let me know as much as possible.

ThanksYou must first a register a sever, right mouse button within sql server groups.

No Item showed

Hi gurus

I have sql server 2000 that was working fine until today(figures), today I opened EM and under sql server group where used to be all my information now there is NO ITEM, nothing shows(database,Nothing) The server is working as I had no complaints from my user on data not been saved or getting data from but its strange that I can not see all my info like I used to.- If I go into sql query analizer, it ask me to connect to local which I do and I can see all my databases from there but once I close that window ,on my EM nothing shows.

I checked all services andevery one of them seems to be up and runnig

Thanks forall the help I can get

Hello,

Sounds like you just need to re-register your server(s).

On the top-level group (sounds like the only group in your case) called "Microsoft SQL Server" right-click and select "New SQL Server Group" Call the group whatever you want. Then, on the newly created group, right-click again and select "New SQL Server Registration". Then enter your server and authentication details. Once done, you'll then be able to expand the server and see all the objects etc.

Cheers,
Rob

|||

R

Thanks for the prompt reply.- I have tried to do that but I get the message the sql group already exist, what I did to resolve the problem was restart the sql service and everything came up, I dont know if it was the right thing to do but it helped

Thank a bunch for the reply.-

No Item showed

Hi gurus

I have sql server 2000 that was working fine until today(figures), today I opened EM and under sql server group where used to be all my information now there is NO ITEM, nothing shows(database,Nothing) The server is working as I had no complaints from my user on data not been saved or getting data from but its strange that I can not see all my info like I used to.- If I go into sql query analizer, it ask me to connect to local which I do and I can see all my databases from there but once I close that window ,on my EM nothing shows.

I checked all services andevery one of them seems to be up and runnig

Thanks forall the help I can get

Hello,

Sounds like you just need to re-register your server(s).

On the top-level group (sounds like the only group in your case) called "Microsoft SQL Server" right-click and select "New SQL Server Group" Call the group whatever you want. Then, on the newly created group, right-click again and select "New SQL Server Registration". Then enter your server and authentication details. Once done, you'll then be able to expand the server and see all the objects etc.

Cheers,
Rob

|||

R

Thanks for the prompt reply.- I have tried to do that but I get the message the sql group already exist, what I did to resolve the problem was restart the sql service and everything came up, I dont know if it was the right thing to do but it helped

Thank a bunch for the reply.-

No grouping?

Hi to all!

To count(something), it is usually required to use a group by function, however, that is not applicable in this case: I would like to select records that have similar values for 'col2' and 'col3', given a certain 'col1', and how many records each 'col1' returns. The following example hopefully makes it clear.

The table:
Col1 Col2 Col3

s1 A B
s1 C D
s2 A B
s2 C D

The result should be:
col1 col2 col3 Expr

s2 A B 2
s2 C D 2

I had figured out the not-working-query:

SELECT *, count(col1)
FROM table as t1 INNER JOIN table as t2 ON
t1.col2 = t2.col2 AND t1.col3 = t3.col3
WHERE col1 = 's1'

Could anyone provide me a hand? Many thanks in advance.

Kind regards,

Nele

SELECT Col1,Col2,Col3,Count(Col1)

FROM TEST

GROUP BY Col1,Col2,Col3

|||

No, that returns for 'expr' value 1.

|||

Are you trying to find those records where value of COL2 and COl3 are similar, which means there is more than one record having same value for col2 and col3

Col1 Col2 Col3

s1 A B
s1 C D
s2 A B
s2 C D

s3 C A

IF I get it correctly, here the last record should not be displayed. Is that what you intend?

|||

In SQL 2000, you can do:

select *, (select count(*) from table as t2 where t2.col1 = 's1') as cnt

from table as t1

where t1.col1 = 's1'

In SQL 2005, you can do:

select *, count(*) over(order by t1.col1) as cnt

from table as t1

where t1.col1 = 's1'

Having said this, there is really no need to complicate the query by doing this. You will only get slow performance. The number of rows that qualifies the query can be obtained by looking at @.@.ROWCOUNT after the SELECT statement or determined in the client side easily. So it seems unnecessary to do this .

|||Yes! That is what I intend.|||

I tried your code, but for sql 2005 it returned an error "incorrect syntax near the keyword 'order' "?

@.@.rowcount returns the total number, I rather would like to know how many records of a certain value for 'col1' are returned (to select the top(100) in the end). E.g., for 's2' that is 2.

|||

How's about:

Select Col2, Col3, Count(distinct col1 )

From ...

Group by Col2, Col3

Having Count(distinct col1) > 1

And if you want Col1 to display, you can add use

Select Max(Col1), Col2, Col3, Count(distinct col1)

|||

Sorry that should be partition by not order by. We don't support ORDER BY clause for aggregate function yet in OVER clause. We support only partition clause.

|||

No, the problem is that I want to know how many times a certain value for 'col1' occurs, not taking into account the values of col2 and col3 for that calculation.

Besides, all have an nvarchar as type.

|||

Yes, that is what I wanted to achieve

Thanks for the reactions!

sql

No aggregations for Measure Group possible in Analysis Server 2005

I have a cube with about 20 Measure Groups and 30 dimensions. I built some dimensions using BI Development Studio a few weeks ago. The aggregations were build for any measure group without problems.

Now I changed some attributes and want to run the aggregation wizard on my test plattform to design new aggregations. But there were no aggregations build. It shows 0 aggregations.

I read that sometimes this happens when the cube is too complex. But the complexity did not grow very much.

What should I do to be able to design aggregations again?

Best regards,
Stefoon

There is an exellent writeup about aggregations in performance guide.

Chirs's blog is good source for information http://cwebbbi.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!7B84B0F2C239489A!907.entry

Edward.

--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

No access to database

I have a Windows Group setup to access a SQL server, say (SQLSUPPORT as windows group) and it's a login account to a SQL server... I have a Windows user, DOMAIN\memberA (as member of the group SQLSUPPORT), and it also has a specific login access account to a SQL server but no database user access...

SQLSUPPORT has db_datareader and db_datawriter permissions to DATABASEa but not DOMAIN\memberA... DOMAIN\memberA does not have specific access to DATABASEa...

I get the error message that DOMAIN\memberA does not have permissions to the database.

How can this be? Why can't the user account that's a member of a group have access to the database when the group has been granted db_datareader and db_datawriter permissions?

BUT, does domain\SQLSupport have permission to access the database?

|||

Yes, SQLSUPPORT has db_datareader and db_datawriter permissions to DATABASEa but not DOMAIN\memberA... DOMAIN\memberA does not have specific access to DATABASEa...

|||

Permissions are cummulative with deny taking precedence. So my first guess it that memberA is impacted by a deny somewhere. Don't just look at the one group - make sure to look at all groups and roles as well as individual permissions and denies for that user account.

-Sue

sql

Next Object id already assigned

I originally posted this problem under "stored proc won't compile" in
the programming group, but now that I've found more detail, I think it
is better suited to this group with a different title.
I can't create any objects in master. What I've found is that the
dbi_nextid is already assigned to another object. Can anyone offer
any suggestions? DBCC checkcatalog and dbcc checkdb return no errors.
create proc simpleproc as select * from sysobjects
returns
Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
Further research has found the the dbi_nextid is already in use.
DBCC TRACEON(3604)
DBCC DBINFO('master')
DBCC TRACEOFF(3604)
returns
dbi_nextid = 1537440551
select name, type, id, crdate from sysobjects where id = 1537440551
returns
name type id crdate
sp_dropmergearticleP 15374405512003-03-09 18:00:50.177
select max(id) from master.dbo.sysobjects
returns
2145442717
@.@.version =
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86)
Dec 17 2002 14:22:05
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.0 (Build 2195: Service Pack 4)
> Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
> There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
>
> Further research has found the the dbi_nextid is already in use.
Why did you go further? It appears you already have a procedure named
simpleproc, and this is why you can't create another one. How about change
the name to splungeproc and see if that works. Why are you creating these
procs in master anyway? How many objects are in master now?
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
|||I went further because I need to get the proc created. It is an SMTP
mail proc that I ultimately need to create. I used the simpleproc
example so people would not have to wade through lines of code. I am
sure simpleproc does not exist
My problem is I can't create any object in master - regardless of the
name or type. Tables, views, stored procs all receive the same error -
object already exists. If I try and drop the object first, I get that
it does not exist.
select * from sysobjects where name = 'simpleproc'
go
drop proc dbo.simpleproc
go
create proc dbo.simpleproc as select * from sysobjects
returns
(0 row(s) affected)
Server: Msg 3701, Level 11, State 5, Line 3
Cannot drop the procedure 'dbo.simpleproc', because it does not exist in
the system catalog.
Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
*** Sent via Devdex http://www.devdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
|||What about my other questions? Why does this have to be in master? How
many objects are in master now?
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"Stephanie Harrell" <stephanie.harrell@.stateauto.com> wrote in message
news:uA3PgWCaEHA.2840@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I went further because I need to get the proc created. It is an SMTP
> mail proc that I ultimately need to create. I used the simpleproc
> example so people would not have to wade through lines of code. I am
> sure simpleproc does not exist
|||A count of sysobjects returns 1305.
I am putting the proc in master because on all my other servers it is in
master. This is an enterprise wide proc developed for standard use in
sending emails from SQL. I don't want it to be in master on all the
other servers and a different database on this one. In hindsight, we
might have made this an extended stored proc, but there is too much code
to go back and change it now.
But all that is really beside the point. I should be able to create
objects in master - whether it is advisable or not - and I can't because
the "next object id" is already being used.
*** Sent via Devdex http://www.devdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
|||This sounds like a known issue - please call Product Support who will assist
you.
Paul Randal
Dev Lead, Microsoft SQL Server Storage Engine
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Stephanie Harrell" <stephanie.harrell@.stateauto.com> wrote in message
news:u2A3XnCaEHA.3996@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> A count of sysobjects returns 1305.
> I am putting the proc in master because on all my other servers it is in
> master. This is an enterprise wide proc developed for standard use in
> sending emails from SQL. I don't want it to be in master on all the
> other servers and a different database on this one. In hindsight, we
> might have made this an extended stored proc, but there is too much code
> to go back and change it now.
> But all that is really beside the point. I should be able to create
> objects in master - whether it is advisable or not - and I can't because
> the "next object id" is already being used.
>
> *** Sent via Devdex http://www.devdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
|||Thank you Paul!!
Since you mentioned a known problem, I found KB Article
http://support.microsoft.com/default...48&Product=sql
And it did the trick. I could not get the supplied script to work, so
I simple coded a drop and create and duplicated the lines 50 or so
times. Then ran that until the object created successfully.
Thanks again
"Paul S Randal [MS]" <prandal@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<e0onLTHaEHA.3888@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>...[vbcol=seagreen]
> This sounds like a known issue - please call Product Support who will assist
> you.
> --
> Paul Randal
> Dev Lead, Microsoft SQL Server Storage Engine
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> "Stephanie Harrell" <stephanie.harrell@.stateauto.com> wrote in message
> news:u2A3XnCaEHA.3996@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Next Object id already assigned

I originally posted this problem under "stored proc won't compile" in
the programming group, but now that I've found more detail, I think it
is better suited to this group with a different title.
I can't create any objects in master. What I've found is that the
dbi_nextid is already assigned to another object. Can anyone offer
any suggestions? DBCC checkcatalog and dbcc checkdb return no errors.
create proc simpleproc as select * from sysobjects
returns
Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
Further research has found the the dbi_nextid is already in use.
DBCC TRACEON(3604)
DBCC DBINFO('master')
DBCC TRACEOFF(3604)
returns
dbi_nextid = 1537440551
select name, type, id, crdate from sysobjects where id = 1537440551
returns
name type id crdate
sp_dropmergearticle P 1537440551 2003-03-09 18:00:50.177
select max(id) from master.dbo.sysobjects
returns
2145442717
@.@.version =
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86)
Dec 17 2002 14:22:05
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.0 (Build 2195: Service Pack 4)> Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
> There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
>
> Further research has found the the dbi_nextid is already in use.
Why did you go further? It appears you already have a procedure named
simpleproc, and this is why you can't create another one. How about change
the name to splungeproc and see if that works. Why are you creating these
procs in master anyway? How many objects are in master now?
--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)

Next Object id already assigned

I originally posted this problem under "stored proc won't compile" in
the programming group, but now that I've found more detail, I think it
is better suited to this group with a different title.
I can't create any objects in master. What I've found is that the
dbi_nextid is already assigned to another object. Can anyone offer
any suggestions? DBCC checkcatalog and dbcc checkdb return no errors.
create proc simpleproc as select * from sysobjects
returns
Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
Further research has found the the dbi_nextid is already in use.
DBCC TRACEON(3604)
DBCC DBINFO('master')
DBCC TRACEOFF(3604)
returns
dbi_nextid = 1537440551
select name, type, id, crdate from sysobjects where id = 1537440551
returns
name type id crdate
sp_dropmergearticle P 1537440551 2003-03-09 18:00:50.177
select max(id) from master.dbo.sysobjects
returns
2145442717
@.@.version =
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86)
Dec 17 2002 14:22:05
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.0 (Build 2195: Service Pack 4)> Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
> There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
>
> Further research has found the the dbi_nextid is already in use.
Why did you go further? It appears you already have a procedure named
simpleproc, and this is why you can't create another one. How about change
the name to splungeproc and see if that works. Why are you creating these
procs in master anyway? How many objects are in master now?
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)|||I went further because I need to get the proc created. It is an SMTP
mail proc that I ultimately need to create. I used the simpleproc
example so people would not have to wade through lines of code. I am
sure simpleproc does not exist
My problem is I can't create any object in master - regardless of the
name or type. Tables, views, stored procs all receive the same error -
object already exists. If I try and drop the object first, I get that
it does not exist.
select * from sysobjects where name = 'simpleproc'
go
drop proc dbo.simpleproc
go
create proc dbo.simpleproc as select * from sysobjects
returns
(0 row(s) affected)
Server: Msg 3701, Level 11, State 5, Line 3
Cannot drop the procedure 'dbo.simpleproc', because it does not exist in
the system catalog.
Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure simpleproc, Line 1
There is already an object named 'simpleproc' in the database.
*** Sent via Devdex http://www.devdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!|||What about my other questions? Why does this have to be in master? How
many objects are in master now?
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"Stephanie Harrell" <stephanie.harrell@.stateauto.com> wrote in message
news:uA3PgWCaEHA.2840@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I went further because I need to get the proc created. It is an SMTP
> mail proc that I ultimately need to create. I used the simpleproc
> example so people would not have to wade through lines of code. I am
> sure simpleproc does not exist|||A count of sysobjects returns 1305.
I am putting the proc in master because on all my other servers it is in
master. This is an enterprise wide proc developed for standard use in
sending emails from SQL. I don't want it to be in master on all the
other servers and a different database on this one. In hindsight, we
might have made this an extended stored proc, but there is too much code
to go back and change it now.
But all that is really beside the point. I should be able to create
objects in master - whether it is advisable or not - and I can't because
the "next object id" is already being used.
*** Sent via Devdex http://www.devdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!|||This sounds like a known issue - please call Product Support who will assist
you.
Paul Randal
Dev Lead, Microsoft SQL Server Storage Engine
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Stephanie Harrell" <stephanie.harrell@.stateauto.com> wrote in message
news:u2A3XnCaEHA.3996@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> A count of sysobjects returns 1305.
> I am putting the proc in master because on all my other servers it is in
> master. This is an enterprise wide proc developed for standard use in
> sending emails from SQL. I don't want it to be in master on all the
> other servers and a different database on this one. In hindsight, we
> might have made this an extended stored proc, but there is too much code
> to go back and change it now.
> But all that is really beside the point. I should be able to create
> objects in master - whether it is advisable or not - and I can't because
> the "next object id" is already being used.
>
> *** Sent via Devdex http://www.devdex.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!|||Thank you Paul!!
Since you mentioned a known problem, I found KB Article
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...448&Product=sql
And it did the trick. I could not get the supplied script to work, so
I simple coded a drop and create and duplicated the lines 50 or so
times. Then ran that until the object created successfully.
Thanks again
"Paul S Randal [MS]" <prandal@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<e0onLTHaEHA.3
888@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>...[vbcol=seagreen]
> This sounds like a known issue - please call Product Support who will assi
st
> you.
> --
> Paul Randal
> Dev Lead, Microsoft SQL Server Storage Engine
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
.
> "Stephanie Harrell" <stephanie.harrell@.stateauto.com> wrote in message
> news:u2A3XnCaEHA.3996@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?

I am aware that there is a discussion group for SQL Server 2005. When the
product is launched on 7/11/2005, should we post SQL Server 2005 question to
this newsgroup OR there will be another newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?
ThanksHi
Existing newsgroups will remain, as Microsoft does not create version
specific groups.
Expect a few more newsgroups to pop up over the next few days for the newer
features for SQL Server 2005.
Keep posting in the normal news groups, just state which version of the
product you are using.
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Jason" <Jason@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:usN0D234FHA.1140@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>I am aware that there is a discussion group for SQL Server 2005. When the
>product is launched on 7/11/2005, should we post SQL Server 2005 question
>to this newsgroup OR there will be another newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?
> Thanks
>

Newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?

I am aware that there is a discussion group for SQL Server 2005. When the
product is launched on 7/11/2005, should we post SQL Server 2005 question to
this newsgroup OR there will be another newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?
ThanksHi
Existing newsgroups will remain, as Microsoft does not create version
specific groups.
Expect a few more newsgroups to pop up over the next few days for the newer
features for SQL Server 2005.
Keep posting in the normal news groups, just state which version of the
product you are using.
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Jason" <Jason@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:usN0D234FHA.1140@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>I am aware that there is a discussion group for SQL Server 2005. When the
>product is launched on 7/11/2005, should we post SQL Server 2005 question
>to this newsgroup OR there will be another newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?
> Thanks
>

Newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?

I am aware that there is a discussion group for SQL Server 2005. When the
product is launched on 7/11/2005, should we post SQL Server 2005 question to
this newsgroup OR there will be another newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?
Thanks
Hi
Existing newsgroups will remain, as Microsoft does not create version
specific groups.
Expect a few more newsgroups to pop up over the next few days for the newer
features for SQL Server 2005.
Keep posting in the normal news groups, just state which version of the
product you are using.
Regards
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Jason" <Jason@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:usN0D234FHA.1140@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>I am aware that there is a discussion group for SQL Server 2005. When the
>product is launched on 7/11/2005, should we post SQL Server 2005 question
>to this newsgroup OR there will be another newsgroup for SQL Server 2005 ?
> Thanks
>

Newsgroup for SQL 2005?

Is there a news group for SQL 2005 beta or is this the best place to post
questions?
Thanks for any help
Alan Smith
Hi Alan,
I think here is the link you are looking for, ENJOY SQL Server 2005!
Welcome to the Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Beta 2 Newsgroups
http://communities.microsoft.com/new...lserver2005&sl
cid=us
Thank you for your patience and cooperation. If you have any questions or
concerns, don't hesitate to let me know. We are here to be of assistance!
Sincerely yours,
Mingqing Cheng
Microsoft Developer Community Support
Introduction to Yukon! - http://www.microsoft.com/sql/yukon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
Please reply to newsgroups only, many thanks!

Newsgroup for SQL 2005?

Is there a news group for SQL 2005 beta or is this the best place to post
questions?
Thanks for any help
Alan SmithHi Alan,
I think here is the link you are looking for, ENJOY SQL Server 2005!
Welcome to the Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Beta 2 Newsgroups
http://communities.microsoft.com/ne...qlserver2005&sl
cid=us
Thank you for your patience and cooperation. If you have any questions or
concerns, don't hesitate to let me know. We are here to be of assistance!
Sincerely yours,
Mingqing Cheng
Microsoft Developer Community Support
---
Introduction to Yukon! - http://www.microsoft.com/sql/yukon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
Please reply to newsgroups only, many thanks!

Newsgroup for SQL 2005?

Is there a news group for SQL 2005 beta or is this the best place to post
questions?
Thanks for any help
Alan SmithHi Alan,
I think here is the link you are looking for, ENJOY SQL Server 2005!
Welcome to the Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Beta 2 Newsgroups
http://communities.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.asp?icp=sqlserver2005&sl
cid=us
Thank you for your patience and cooperation. If you have any questions or
concerns, don't hesitate to let me know. We are here to be of assistance!
Sincerely yours,
Mingqing Cheng
Microsoft Developer Community Support
---
Introduction to Yukon! - http://www.microsoft.com/sql/yukon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
Please reply to newsgroups only, many thanks!

News Group for SQL2005....

Is there any news group for SQL 2005 hosted on this server?
Thanks,
Johnprivatenews.microsoft.com contains the SQLServer2005 news groups.
"John Smith" <JJSmith1956@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ugWOATuDFHA.2676@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Is there any news group for SQL 2005 hosted on this server?
> Thanks,
> John
>|||http://communities.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.asp?icp=sqlserver2005
Thanks!
Kent Tegels
MVP - SQL Server
--The SSX FAQ & Blog: http://tinyurl.com/6r4gb
--My Blog: http://www.tegels.org/|||thank you all
"Kent Tegels" <kent@.tegels.org> wrote in message
news:406733632435563908288288@.msnews.microsoft.com...
> http://communities.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.asp?icp=sqlserver2005
> Thanks!
> Kent Tegels
> MVP - SQL Server
> --The SSX FAQ & Blog: http://tinyurl.com/6r4gb
> --My Blog: http://www.tegels.org/
>

News Group for SQL2005....

Is there any news group for SQL 2005 hosted on this server?
Thanks,
Johnprivatenews.microsoft.com contains the SQLServer2005 news groups.
"John Smith" <JJSmith1956@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ugWOATuDFHA.2676@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Is there any news group for SQL 2005 hosted on this server?
> Thanks,
> John
>|||http://communities.microsoft.com/ne...p=sqlserver2005
Thanks!
Kent Tegels
MVP - SQL Server
--The SSX FAQ & Blog: http://tinyurl.com/6r4gb
--My Blog: http://www.tegels.org/|||thank you all
"Kent Tegels" <kent@.tegels.org> wrote in message
news:406733632435563908288288@.msnews.microsoft.com...
> http://communities.microsoft.com/ne...p=sqlserver2005
> Thanks!
> Kent Tegels
> MVP - SQL Server
> --The SSX FAQ & Blog: http://tinyurl.com/6r4gb
> --My Blog: http://www.tegels.org/
>